<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for San Francisco Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creative and Clever Ideas to Promote Your Book by Mary</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/02/creative-and-clever-ideas-to-promote-your-book/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=699#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>With today&#039;s rapidly changing publishing industry, many new authors are entering the scene.  So achieving visibility is even more critical than ever.  I think you offer some really valid points, here.  As a book publicist myself, I enjoy interacting and connecting with book bloggers.  They can truly create a buzz around a client&#039;s work.  

&quot;Continual exposure over time results in sales.&quot;  Yes, and I think authors have to realize that visibility has to come first.  It might be a slower process to build sales, but building a lasting audience should be the ultimate goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With today&#8217;s rapidly changing publishing industry, many new authors are entering the scene.  So achieving visibility is even more critical than ever.  I think you offer some really valid points, here.  As a book publicist myself, I enjoy interacting and connecting with book bloggers.  They can truly create a buzz around a client&#8217;s work.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Continual exposure over time results in sales.&#8221;  Yes, and I think authors have to realize that visibility has to come first.  It might be a slower process to build sales, but building a lasting audience should be the ultimate goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Participate in Children&#8217;s Book Week 2012! by Peter Smelzer</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/02/participate-in-childrens-book-week-2012/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=643#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>My 9 year old is interested in reviewing books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 9 year old is interested in reviewing books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Interview with Philip Fradkin (Part Two) by An Interview with Philip Fradkin &#124; San Francisco Book Review</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/02/an-interview-with-philip-fradkin-part-two/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interview with Philip Fradkin &#124; San Francisco Book Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=632#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>[...] x &gt;&gt; Continue to Part Two of the Interview [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] x &gt;&gt; Continue to Part Two of the Interview [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Interview with Philip Fradkin (Part One) by An Interview with Philip Fradkin (Part Two) &#124; San Francisco Book Review</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/02/an-interview-with-philip-fradkin-part-one/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interview with Philip Fradkin (Part Two) &#124; San Francisco Book Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=594#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>[...] &lt;&lt; Read Part One [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &lt;&lt; Read Part One [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop! In the Name of Editing: Why Self-Publishers Should Resist the Urge to Push the Submit Button Before Producing a First Draft by Jayne Navarre</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/02/stop-in-the-name-of-editing-why-self-publishers-should-resist-the-urge-to-push-the-submit-button-before-producing-a-first-draft/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayne Navarre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=610#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>Good advice for aspiring writers who seek publication, Susan. Here are a few extra thoughts. 

The self-publishing industry is not new, just cheaper and more immediate as you say and thus ever more dangerous. Still, going the route of a trade publisher or even an independent or small publisher is tough. But the pay off is that getting a publisher is going to force you to distance yourself from your work and that will improve it exponentially once the heart and soul are in place. 

The first time I read &quot;Flirting in Spanish&quot; it was a self-published eBook. As a publisher, I cringed at the typos, formatting issues and inconsistencies. Yet, the story was so strong that once I started I could not stop reading it. And that should be the only job of the author...to get the story right...the characters, setting, plot and organization need to be in place, be utterly demanding of attention and ultimately shout: everyone needs to read this book. That&#039;s what a publisher wants to hear upon reading a synopsis, pitch, or the first 25 pages. 

I strongly believe the author needs a publisher. They need a publisher to ensure that it is copy edited and line edited. They need a publisher to design an attractive presentation, to define its audience (for promotion and sales) and maybe more importantly DISTRIBUTE IT! Self publishing fails on almost all those levels. Sure, we&#039;ve heard about the handful of self-published titles that got lucky, made it big, found a trade publisher, or even earned movie rights, but that is the exception, not the rule. 

At Antaeus, we believe that compelling stories and serious authors deserve the services of a publisher. Though we certainly do not publish all the manuscripts that cross our threshold, for many reasons the least of which include genre or marketability, when a story is worth telling, we want to give it a fighting chance!

Carry on, Susan. You are an interesting artist and I can&#039;t wait to see what&#039;s up next for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice for aspiring writers who seek publication, Susan. Here are a few extra thoughts. </p>
<p>The self-publishing industry is not new, just cheaper and more immediate as you say and thus ever more dangerous. Still, going the route of a trade publisher or even an independent or small publisher is tough. But the pay off is that getting a publisher is going to force you to distance yourself from your work and that will improve it exponentially once the heart and soul are in place. </p>
<p>The first time I read &#8220;Flirting in Spanish&#8221; it was a self-published eBook. As a publisher, I cringed at the typos, formatting issues and inconsistencies. Yet, the story was so strong that once I started I could not stop reading it. And that should be the only job of the author&#8230;to get the story right&#8230;the characters, setting, plot and organization need to be in place, be utterly demanding of attention and ultimately shout: everyone needs to read this book. That&#8217;s what a publisher wants to hear upon reading a synopsis, pitch, or the first 25 pages. </p>
<p>I strongly believe the author needs a publisher. They need a publisher to ensure that it is copy edited and line edited. They need a publisher to design an attractive presentation, to define its audience (for promotion and sales) and maybe more importantly DISTRIBUTE IT! Self publishing fails on almost all those levels. Sure, we&#8217;ve heard about the handful of self-published titles that got lucky, made it big, found a trade publisher, or even earned movie rights, but that is the exception, not the rule. </p>
<p>At Antaeus, we believe that compelling stories and serious authors deserve the services of a publisher. Though we certainly do not publish all the manuscripts that cross our threshold, for many reasons the least of which include genre or marketability, when a story is worth telling, we want to give it a fighting chance!</p>
<p>Carry on, Susan. You are an interesting artist and I can&#8217;t wait to see what&#8217;s up next for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop! In the Name of Editing: Why Self-Publishers Should Resist the Urge to Push the Submit Button Before Producing a First Draft by Sheryl Dunn</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/02/stop-in-the-name-of-editing-why-self-publishers-should-resist-the-urge-to-push-the-submit-button-before-producing-a-first-draft/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryl Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=610#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Hi, Susan,

I agree wholeheartedly with your post. All anyone has to do is to subscribe to BookDaily.com and let their system send you random chapters. You&#039;ll get some self-published chapters and some published chapters.

If I had a dollar for every opening paragraph I&#039;ve read, and immediately known that the work was self-published, I&#039;d be rich. 

Writing is both art and craft, but to let the art shine, you should know the craft as well. I cannot understand why so many self-published authors don&#039;t realize that their ignorance is showing from the get-go. The ability to self-publish is a wonderful freedom, but every freedom comes with correlative responsibilities: to society and to oneself. If you have something important to say or an important story to tell, surely you owe it to yourself and to the public to say or tell it in the best way possible. (That said, I know some excellent self-published works.)

And I definitely agree with your comment about self-publishing authors banding together to cross-promote their books, sometimes without even having read the works they&#039;re cross-promoting. Surely they must realize that you are known by the company you keep, and if you keep company with poor writing, you will be tarred with the same brush.

Something you didn&#039;t mention, but I have no doubt you&#039;re aware of this, most of the self-published authors I know, I don&#039;t know, i.e., I know nothing about them, but I sure as heck know everything about their book and the steps they&#039;re taking to promote it. I&#039;ve unfriended many of them on Facebook because they help only each other to promote, and really don&#039;t add much value to my interactions with people there. I&#039;m tired of being spammed all the time. They seem to have no idea that other writers are not their audiences. Yes, writers read (or ought to, as you said), and writers do buy books, but we can&#039;t buy every book out there simply because we &quot;know&quot; the author. These people should focus more on building relationships (assuming they&#039;ve written a good book, of course) with their readers than on constant promotion.

With over 3,000,000 books flooding the market last year, due, in large part, to the ability to self-publish, it becomes even more difficult for good books to be noticed. I worry about the potential &quot;dumbing down&quot; of public taste, to the point that good writing becomes simply a niche market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Susan,</p>
<p>I agree wholeheartedly with your post. All anyone has to do is to subscribe to BookDaily.com and let their system send you random chapters. You&#8217;ll get some self-published chapters and some published chapters.</p>
<p>If I had a dollar for every opening paragraph I&#8217;ve read, and immediately known that the work was self-published, I&#8217;d be rich. </p>
<p>Writing is both art and craft, but to let the art shine, you should know the craft as well. I cannot understand why so many self-published authors don&#8217;t realize that their ignorance is showing from the get-go. The ability to self-publish is a wonderful freedom, but every freedom comes with correlative responsibilities: to society and to oneself. If you have something important to say or an important story to tell, surely you owe it to yourself and to the public to say or tell it in the best way possible. (That said, I know some excellent self-published works.)</p>
<p>And I definitely agree with your comment about self-publishing authors banding together to cross-promote their books, sometimes without even having read the works they&#8217;re cross-promoting. Surely they must realize that you are known by the company you keep, and if you keep company with poor writing, you will be tarred with the same brush.</p>
<p>Something you didn&#8217;t mention, but I have no doubt you&#8217;re aware of this, most of the self-published authors I know, I don&#8217;t know, i.e., I know nothing about them, but I sure as heck know everything about their book and the steps they&#8217;re taking to promote it. I&#8217;ve unfriended many of them on Facebook because they help only each other to promote, and really don&#8217;t add much value to my interactions with people there. I&#8217;m tired of being spammed all the time. They seem to have no idea that other writers are not their audiences. Yes, writers read (or ought to, as you said), and writers do buy books, but we can&#8217;t buy every book out there simply because we &#8220;know&#8221; the author. These people should focus more on building relationships (assuming they&#8217;ve written a good book, of course) with their readers than on constant promotion.</p>
<p>With over 3,000,000 books flooding the market last year, due, in large part, to the ability to self-publish, it becomes even more difficult for good books to be noticed. I worry about the potential &#8220;dumbing down&#8221; of public taste, to the point that good writing becomes simply a niche market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Saying “Thank You!” by Kent Weber</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/01/saying-thank-you/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=601#comment-966</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thank you&quot; Kate. The simple title and thesis are always the most profound. This is great reminder. I have a little &quot;ketchup&quot; to do on the backlog :)  Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thank you&#8221; Kate. The simple title and thesis are always the most profound. This is great reminder. I have a little &#8220;ketchup&#8221; to do on the backlog <img src='http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outward Bound by Friday Five! &#124; BookSparks PR</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/01/outward-bound/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Five! &#124; BookSparks PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=581#comment-878</guid>
		<description>[...] Reiner &#8211; author of memoir THE MAN WHO COULDN&#8217;T EAT &#8211; stopped by San Francisco Book Review and shared a great essay on the writing process. Here is one of the lessons he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reiner &#8211; author of memoir THE MAN WHO COULDN&#8217;T EAT &#8211; stopped by San Francisco Book Review and shared a great essay on the writing process. Here is one of the lessons he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Negative Publicity Coverage Isn’t Necessarily the Worst Thing in the World by Capability</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/01/why-negative-publicity-coverage-isnt-necessarily-the-worst-thing-in-the-world/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Capability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=564#comment-818</guid>
		<description>I have been getting scary self published books to review - thank you for this - very helpful as I am honest and cannot say I like something if I do not. Also, in your post &#039;well&#039; auto corrects to &#039;we&#039;ll &#039; - 
Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been getting scary self published books to review &#8211; thank you for this &#8211; very helpful as I am honest and cannot say I like something if I do not. Also, in your post &#8216;well&#8217; auto corrects to &#8216;we&#8217;ll &#8216; &#8211;<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amazon vs. the Publishers by Meredith Greene</title>
		<link>http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/2012/01/amazon-vs-the-publishers/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanfranciscobookreview.com/?p=560#comment-811</guid>
		<description>This article is one of the main reasons why trumping up your own brand is a bad idea, folks can smell BS (for lack of a better acronym) a mile away. As hard as it is to get customer to leave feedback, let alone positive feedback, creating it yourself defeats the purpose of having legitimate reviews. Most folks know that top publishers have done this for years, in everything from self-created blogs, remarks, favorable reviews, etc. to the point that the average consumer just shrugs at all the glowing praise of a particular book and then they do what they always have: either take the recommendation of a close contact, or browse the bookstore/online venue and read excerpts. 

Self-pub writers do sometimes fall into that hype-yourself-with-fake-reviews trap--I have resisted such tactics--but most of those in my contact circles do not, replying on mere reminders to their eBooks buyers to &#039;like&#039; and tweet and comment.  

In my opinion, getting &quot;top&quot; authors to contribute to the Kindle Store is not going to make that big an impact. Consumers will only accept so much change, branding tactics and price gouging before they seek other means of literary gratification. Best-selling books are downloaded from 4shared (and other file-sharing sites) at a rate that would make any author shake in their proverbial boots, and the number of free novels available online makes any newbie self-pubber think twice (and thrice again) before even trying to join the eBook race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is one of the main reasons why trumping up your own brand is a bad idea, folks can smell BS (for lack of a better acronym) a mile away. As hard as it is to get customer to leave feedback, let alone positive feedback, creating it yourself defeats the purpose of having legitimate reviews. Most folks know that top publishers have done this for years, in everything from self-created blogs, remarks, favorable reviews, etc. to the point that the average consumer just shrugs at all the glowing praise of a particular book and then they do what they always have: either take the recommendation of a close contact, or browse the bookstore/online venue and read excerpts. </p>
<p>Self-pub writers do sometimes fall into that hype-yourself-with-fake-reviews trap&#8211;I have resisted such tactics&#8211;but most of those in my contact circles do not, replying on mere reminders to their eBooks buyers to &#8216;like&#8217; and tweet and comment.  </p>
<p>In my opinion, getting &#8220;top&#8221; authors to contribute to the Kindle Store is not going to make that big an impact. Consumers will only accept so much change, branding tactics and price gouging before they seek other means of literary gratification. Best-selling books are downloaded from 4shared (and other file-sharing sites) at a rate that would make any author shake in their proverbial boots, and the number of free novels available online makes any newbie self-pubber think twice (and thrice again) before even trying to join the eBook race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

